launch&found
Strategy

ROAS Benchmarks: What a Good Return Looks Like in 2026

ROAS benchmarks by industry and channel, plus how to work out the break-even ROAS your own margins demand before you judge a campaign.

Jessica12 min read

Most published ROAS benchmarks land between 2:1 and 4:1 for paid ads overall. Google Ads usually sits above Meta, and Search sits above Display. But the only benchmark that decides whether your ads make money is your own break-even ROAS, which is 1 divided by your gross profit margin. A 3x return can be a win for one business and a slow loss for another.

This guide gives you the numbers by industry and channel, shows you how to calculate your own floor, and explains why two reports can disagree about the same campaign. We're a marketing agency in London, Ontario, and we see business owners get this wrong in both directions: shutting off ads that were profitable, and keeping ads running that never cleared their costs.

TL;DR

  • Typical overall ROAS benchmarks run from about 2:1 to 4:1. Google Ads medians cluster around 3.2x to 3.5x, Meta around 1.9x to 2.2x, and TikTok around 1.4x to 1.5x.
  • Industry matters a lot. Medians from one 2026 US benchmark set run from 1.8x (legal) to 3.4x (ecommerce).
  • Your break-even ROAS is 1 divided by your gross margin. A 40% margin means you need 2.5x just to cover costs.
  • Benchmarks are context, not targets. Measurement method, campaign type and sales cycle can move the same number a long way.
  • We price every engagement by custom quote after assessing fit. Contact us to see if we're a fit.

Table of Contents

What ROAS actually measures

Return on ad spend is revenue attributed to ads divided by what you spent on those ads. Spend $1,000, get $3,000 in tracked revenue, and your ROAS is 3.0, or 3:1, or 300%. Same thing, three ways of writing it.

Two things ROAS does not tell you:

  1. Whether you made money. It uses revenue, not profit. Costs of goods, labor, shipping and overhead are invisible to it.
  2. Whether the revenue was caused by the ad. It only counts what your tracking credits to the ad.

If you're deciding between ROAS and a profit-based measure, we cover that in ROAS vs ROI: what each tells you and which to track.

Why "4:1 is good" is only half an answer

The most repeated rule in ad guides is that 4:1 is the target and 2:1 is roughly break-even. It's a fine starting point and a bad finish line. Whether 4:1 is good depends entirely on your margin.

Shopify's break-even guidance gives the formula: break-even ROAS equals 1 divided by gross profit margin. Its example is a $100 product with $60 in variable costs. That's a 40% margin, so you need a ROAS of 2.5 just to cover costs.

Here's how that plays out at different margins (simple arithmetic from the same formula):

Gross marginBreak-even ROASWhat a 3.0 ROAS means
20%5.0Losing money on every ad-driven sale
25%4.0Losing money
40%2.5Profitable, with a thin cushion
60%1.67Comfortably profitable

A contractor with a 50% margin on a $6,000 job breaks even at 2.0. A retailer with a 20% margin needs 5.0 before the first dollar of profit. Same ad platform, completely different definition of "good."

Shopify's own benchmark guidance makes the same point: a strong ROAS depends on margins, COGS, shipping costs, goals and repeat purchase rate, and the number that matters most is the one that clears your break-even.

Two adjustments owners forget

  • Repeat customers. If a customer buys three times over two years, a first-purchase ROAS of 1.5 may be perfectly healthy. Count lifetime gross profit, not just the first order.
  • Leads versus sales. Service businesses often book revenue weeks after the ad click, and offline. If your call or form leads are closed by phone, ROAS in the ad platform will understate what happened unless you feed those sales back in.

ROAS benchmarks by industry

Industry medians swing widely because margins, order values and buying intent differ. Here is one 2026 set, Benchmarketing's median ROAS by industry (US data, updated Q1 2026):

IndustryMedian ROAS
Ecommerce3.40x
Home services3.20x
Automotive2.80x
B2B services2.60x
Financial services2.30x
SaaS2.10x
Healthcare1.90x
Legal1.80x

Within ecommerce, the spread is wide: the 25th percentile is 1.8x and the 75th is 5.6x. So "average" hides a lot of businesses doing much better and much worse.

Other reports cut the data differently, and they don't agree:

  • Triple Whale's Google Ads medians for October 2025 to September 2026 range from 4.24 for sports and outdoors to 2.03 for health and wellness, with automotive at 3.98 and home and garden at 3.37.
  • Rule1's analysis of full-year 2025 Triple Whale data puts median ecommerce ROAS across all verticals at 2.87x.
  • Two Minute Reports found 2025 Google Ads medians running from 0.15x for pets and animal services to 7.62x for toys and games.

The lesson: use industry figures to sanity-check, not to set a target. A 7x in one category and a 0.15x in another tell you about the category, not about the quality of the campaign.

What about Canada?

Most published benchmark data is built from US advertisers or global ecommerce stores, and Canadian-specific ROAS data is thin. One modeled estimate, from AdBenchly's Canada page (June 2026), puts the average Google Ads ROAS across 38 industries at 3.85x, with legal at the low end (2.51x) and hotels at the high end (7.40x). Treat modeled numbers as a rough guide.

For a Canadian business, the practical answer is the same as everywhere: calculate your own break-even in Canadian dollars, using your own margins, then track your own results for a few months. If you're planning spend, our guides on how much Google Ads costs in Canada and how much to budget will help you size the test.

ROAS benchmarks by advertising channel

Channel changes the number as much as industry does. Search ads catch people already looking to buy. Social ads interrupt people who weren't.

Triple Whale's data for October 2025 to September 2026 shows these medians:

ChannelMedian ROAS
Google Ads3.18
Meta Ads1.88
TikTok Ads1.47
Amazon Ads3.04
Pinterest Ads2.06
Snapchat Ads4.06

Other sources land in the same neighborhood. Superscale, citing Varos data from 28 industries, reports a 3.31x median for Google Ads and 2.19x for Meta. The range is consistent: Google roughly 3x to 3.5x, Meta roughly 1.9x to 2.2x, TikTok roughly 1.4x to 1.5x.

Google campaign types are not interchangeable

Blending every Google campaign into one ROAS is a common mistake. Rule1's data shows Search campaigns returning a median of 5.17, Shopping 2.88, Performance Max 2.57, Smart 1.72, Video 0.52 and Display 0.12. Video and Display often exist to build awareness and feed later conversions, so judging them on direct ROAS alone can mislead.

If you run Search, keyword match types shape both spend and return. Our guide on broad match vs phrase match explains which to use and when.

Google vs Meta for your business

A lower Meta ROAS doesn't make Meta a bad choice. It makes it a different job: creating demand rather than harvesting it. We compare how each fits different goals in Google Ads vs Facebook Ads. Retargeting campaigns on Meta typically run well above prospecting, and InsightIQ's platform benchmarks put Meta retargeting at 3.0 to 5.0:1 against a 2.19:1 Meta overall average.

Why two reports show different ROAS for the same ads

Benchmarks mix different measurement methods, and that alone can change the number dramatically. Ruler Analytics' benchmark report shows Facebook prospecting at a last-click ROAS of 0, a data-driven impression ROAS of 2.55 and a marketing mix model ROAS of 4.1. TikTok prospecting shows the same pattern: 0 on last click, 2.86 on data-driven impressions and 2.1 on marketing mix modeling.

That zero is not a failed campaign. Last-click gives all the credit to the final touch, which for upper-funnel social ads is usually something else, such as a branded search or a direct visit.

The same logic applies to TikTok in general. Because it reaches people who aren't yet shopping, its direct ROAS looks lower and its effect shows up later and across other channels. If you're also tracking app installs, revenue and ad monetization side by side, app revenue and ads analytics can help you see delayed conversions that last-click reporting hides.

What to do with this:

  1. Know which attribution model your platform report uses.
  2. Compare channels under the same model, not across different ones.
  3. Check platform ROAS against your actual bank-account revenue for the same period.
  4. For service businesses, import closed jobs back into your ad account so ROAS reflects real sales.

How to use benchmarks without being misled by them

Here's the process we'd follow with a business owner.

  1. Work out your break-even ROAS. 1 divided by gross margin. Write it down.
  2. Set a target above it. You want profit, not just a covered cost. How far above depends on your overhead and how fast you want to grow.
  3. Pick the benchmark that matches your channel and campaign type. A Search benchmark tells you nothing about a Display campaign.
  4. Give campaigns time. Early weeks are learning periods. Judging after a few days is how good campaigns get shut off.
  5. Fix the leaks before raising spend. Slow pages, a weak offer and unanswered calls all drag ROAS down regardless of the ads. A site that never rings the phone makes even good ads look bad.
  6. Track by campaign, not just account-wide. A strong brand-search campaign can hide a weak prospecting campaign in the average.

If a number looks off, ask whether the problem is the ad, the landing page or the follow-up. In our experience, owners blame the ad first, and it's often the page or the phone.

Our perspective

We don't give clients a ROAS target before we've seen their margins. A benchmark from someone else's industry, country or attribution setup is a guess about your business, and acting on a guess is the common mistake.

Our approach starts with your numbers: what a customer is worth, what a lead costs to close, and where leads are getting lost between the click and the signed job. Then we build ads, a site and tracking that make those numbers visible.

We work with multiple industries, not only realtors, and our home base is London, Ontario. We also serve businesses across the surrounding Ontario service areas. Scope and pricing are tailored to each business, so we quote after assessing fit rather than handing out a fixed package.

Launch & Found

Work with Launch & Found

If you want ad spend managed against your own break-even number, we run Google Ads and Facebook and Instagram ads for local and regional businesses, and we build the websites and media that make those clicks convert. We also offer a Founder's Audit if you'd like a look at what's working before you commit.

Pricing is by custom quote after we assess fit. Contact Launch & Found for a quote, or see everything we offer on our main site.

FAQ

What is a good ROAS?

Most guides put a good overall ROAS between 2:1 and 4:1, with 4:1 the common target. The real answer is whatever clears your break-even ROAS with room for profit. With a 40% margin, break-even is 2.5, so 4:1 is healthy. With a 20% margin, break-even is 5.0, so 4:1 loses money.

Is a 1.6 ROAS good?

Usually not on its own. A 1.6 ROAS is only profitable if your gross margin is above about 62.5%, since break-even is 1 divided by margin. It can still make sense for a first sale if repeat purchases are common or if the campaign is feeding later conversions.

Which channel has the highest ROAS?

Search campaigns on Google generally return more than social channels because they reach people already looking to buy. In Triple Whale's 2025 to 2026 data, Google Ads had a 3.18 median against 1.88 for Meta. Social still earns its place when you need to create demand rather than capture it.

How much should a small Ontario business budget to test ads?

It depends on your average sale and how many conversions you need to learn from. Our guide on Google Ads budgets in Canada walks through how to size a test. If you'd like a plan for your business, contact us for a quote.

Sources

Sources

Read next